![]() ![]() The amendments in ASU 2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on Febru(the “Form 10-K”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) to state fairly the financial position of the Company and its results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented. GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. The amounts as of December 31, 2014 have been derived from the Company’s annual audited financial statements. ![]() In 2022, he also received the Minority Bar Coalition’s Unity Award for advancing diversity in the legal profession.The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of Maand 2014, and for the three months then ended, have been prepared by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”) for interim financial information. Bravo, a human rights case that resulted in the 5 th largest jury verdict in Florida federal court in 2022. In 2023, the firm received the Center for Justice and Accountability’s Partner in Justice Award for his work in Camps v. Krishnan also serves on the boards of several non-profits and has a thriving pro bono practice, having litigated numerous civil rights cases in state and federal court. In 2018, Law 360 named him a Rising Star in Intellectual Property-a recognition of attorneys under the age of 40 only six attorneys nationwide received this distinction. Krishnan received the California Lawyer Attorney of the Year award in Intellectual Property for his work on the groundbreaking copyright and patent case, Cisco v. His technology clients include Comcast, Google, Arista Networks, and Western Digital. He has tried 12 cases to decision, including six as first chair. ![]() Ajay Krishnan is an experienced litigator who focuses on complex commercial disputes and intellectual property litigation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |